It is interesting to read about other people’s perspective
on the English language. Not from people like me who speak English fluently. I
love to see how people who are new to the language see it. The first idea associates
the English language with power, as a global standard for politics and an international industry standard. It breaded
the idea that a person cannot survive in any scalable business, education or career without English.
In the example of Mother's
tongue by Amy Tan, I like the scenario
where the mother is at the hospital desk, where they were told the scan conducted
was lost. Because of the mother’s poor/broken English,
the hospital makes the woman the last priority and even attempts to cheat her
by telling her she would need to pay and have the test redone over an extended period. Medially this is the time she does not have.
The section has personality, describing a serious environment,
and over the counter argument in a public place. Sentences are very long, detailed
and emotion and tension of the situation.
The cause of the whole text,
in general, is very newsworthy, it
shares a raw perspective in the first person, this causal form of writing is
great for the reader and the speaker, this form of language through a public
media means that there are no filters of the content. Content is straight from
a perspective to an audience. Making the information pure form the source,
giving credible primary perspectives on an area of interest.
Tan does not provide any real call to action in the column. This
suggests that the purpose of the text is to create awareness of the issue, as a
reader I interpreted an evaluative question of ‘Is this an issue that can ever
be resolved?’ and the truth is that it can’t, people are so ignorant and don’t care
about anyone other than themselves, it is a bias to themselves and their own English.
Which raises another question as to ‘who
gets to decide what the perfect English is?’
In the example to the CAT scan scenario Tan uses Hard-facts
and Logos, she appeals to logic, justifying
why the situation is serious. The logic that the mother's husband and son have both recently died of brain tumors
persuades the reader to believe physically the seriousness of the situation. Showing
how Hard facts and Logos work together to create evoke emotion in the reader.
Saed Abdulhadi – October 2017
You have clearly demonstrated an awareness of how the conventions of an opinion column are demonstrated in Tan's essay.
ReplyDeleteSome of your points could be explained further, for example the question about who decides what is the perfect English?